Thursday, April 3, 2014

Meaghan Sylver reaction 2

The change between Michael in part 1 and part 2 is evident. In the beginning Michael appears to be an innocent young man looking for someone to show him how to love and growing up with that person, Hanna, and becoming extremely accustomed to her. In part 2 Michael realizes how much of a fool he was and vows to never love again. This motivation of having Hanna who left him sets him apart from the next part of his life. He becomes very detached to those who he dates. For example, he spends time with Sophie and when she is finally able to have sex with him he tells her they cannot be together and it is evident he does not truly love her.
It almost seems as if Michael has been completely brainwashed by Hanna that his brain cannot take in anything else. It seems at the beginning of part 2 that if he is even remotely reminded of his relationship with Hanna through another relationship that he would just terminate it. With the idea of giving love a rest, and appearing to abandon the idea as a whole, Michael starts to focus on his studies and the novel becomes filled with more intellectual information. Michael becomes wrapped up in his study with mechanical devotion until the idea of war crime sweeps him off his feet.
I believe this book is for a mature audience and is at the right level for the audience reading it, meaning this class. I also find it very interesting so far although I must admit to finding part 1 more interesting than part 2.


No comments:

Post a Comment